Google will stop serving Flash ads in 2017
Adobe Flash's death march continues. Google announced Tuesday that beginning June 30, display ads built in Flash can no longer be uploaded to AdWords or DoubleClick Digital Marketing — it's two biggest ad products.
In a Google+ post announcing the news, Google added that it will stop running Flash ads on Jan. 2, 2017.
The one minor caveat is that video ads using Flash will still continue to work and be served.
This is just the latest sign that Flash on the web is truly coming to an end. And that's a good thing, because despite the major role Flash played in the development of the modern web, it's time for the technology to go away.
Not only is Flash a frequent vulnerability target, it's non-existent presence on mobile has made it legacy technology with no real future.
Even Adobe renamed its Flash creation suite Adobe Animate CC last Fall.
Still, Flash has persisted on the web, in large part because plenty of advertisers still use it to serve displays ads. Google is in a unique position as both the market leader in both desktop web browsers and as an ad platform to help kill Flash altogether.
For its part, Google has offered HTML5 ad tools for years. And last year, it made HTML5 the default video player for YouTube.
Forcing advertisers to move to HTML5 for ads is what we hope will be one of the final steps in helping rid all of our web browsers of Flash.
The tech behind Super Bowl 50: 1,300 Wi-Fi hotspots, 16 camera angles and more
The Super Bowl is a long American tradition of brute force meeting skill on the gridiron as the world waits to see who will emerge victorious.
But in our newly tech-powered mediascape, how exactly will all that action find its way to the eyeballs of millions of footballs fans watching on Sunday? We investigated, talked to both the NFL and CBS, the official broadcaster (in the U.S.) to find out exactly how much tech it takes to put on football's Big Game.
The CBS broadcast will include:
256 microphones to record sound.
100+ cameras shooting pre-game and game footage for the TV show.
16 camera angles from eight new Pylon Cameras, the first time the Super Bowl has employed this on-the-field technique.
11 complete Avid editing suites, along with 10 graphics stations and a voiceover booth will work in real-time to produce the broadcast.
5K cameras to capture 360-degree game footage for quick playback in what the production calls "EyeVision 360."
3 aerial camera systems will work to capture game action from the sky.
Wi-Fi Access
This year the game's Wi-Fi access is being handled by Hewlett-Packard's Aruba Networks. The company will provide 1,300 802.11ac Wi-Fi access points throughout the stadium, supported beacons under every 100 seats.
The wireless connectively, which surfaced in a report from Network World, are expected to be able to handle the online activity of the almost 70,000 football fans in attendance. The report also notes that, compared to the data traffic from last year's Super Bowl 49, which was around 6 terabytes, the data traffic for Super Bowl 50 is expected to nearly double that at around 10TB.
Watching at the Game
If you have bad seats (stop — there are no bad seats at the Super Bowl, but anyway…) you'll still be able to catch the action via two 48-foot-tall and 200-foot-wide high-definition video boards situated above each end zone.
Additionally, the stadium has installed 2,000 Sony televisions around the stadium, ensuring that you'll be able to stay abreast of any expected developments if you need to leave your seat for the concession stand during the game.
Virtual Reality & Interactive Games
No, no, you won't be able to watch the game in virtual reality, but rest assured that, based on current developments, that's probably coming soon. What you will be able to do in VR is go through a football training program produced by SAP at its "Fan Energy Zone" in downtown San Francisco. The company will also provide interactive football experiences and games at the facility through a 50-foot-wide video wall. The wall will also display statistics from the Super Bowl game as it happens as well as user-generated content.
Neonotix Technologies Private Limited's photo.
Sensor-1 is the highly versatile security device you can stick onto anything
We all need security, whether for keeping an eye on your house when you’re gone, making sure nobody rifles through your files or opens up your laptop after you leave work, or just seeing if your 8-year-old is digging into the snack drawer when you’re not looking. There’s one little device that covers all these things and more.
The Sensor-1 is a movement-detecting security device about the size of a quarter. It sticks to surfaces with a 3M Command Strip and can light up and sound an alarm if moved, alert you if you’ve left it behind, or stealthily track how and when it’s moved.
The Sensor-1 by MetaSensor just released on Indiegogo at $79 per device and is estimated to ship around September.
How it works
“[Sensor-1] scans the environment and then it stores a measurement,” CEO and founder Nick Warren told Mashable. “If that measurement changes beyond a certain amount, then it alarms.”
After setting the alarm on the Sensor-1, it uses a combination of a gyroscope, an accelerometer and a magnetometer to judge exactly where and how much it moves. You can connect it to your phone or other devices via Bluetooth up to 300 feet, and it can then connect to the Internet and give you live updates on its status no matter where you are. If it isn’t connected, it stores 24 hours of movement data for when you come back within range.
There are other small, motion-detecting security devices like the Doberman, but they don't offer nearly as much customization and don't alert the user through Bluetooth on its movement.
It’s up to you how the device will react. The settings are controlled with the Aletha app, where you can change how the Sensor-1 lights up its three RGB LEDs, how loud it will sound its alarm (from silent up to 85 decibels), and even how much movement is required to trigger the alarm. The app will be available for iOS at launch, and the Android app is slated for late 2016.
There are also presets for specific objects like doors, bags or bikes There are also presets for specific objects like doors, bags or bikes. For the “bags, briefcases and luggage” preset, the alarm won’t be triggered unless it moves more than four inches, which allows you to adjust your bag a normal amount without it sounding off. Don’t worry about constantly fiddling with the app. You can set a proximity between you and your device so it won’t set off the alarm if you’re within a certain distance, otherwise you might be accidentally setting it off all the time.
The Aletha mobile app allows you to set how and when the Sensor-1's alarm goes off, which includes preset settings for specific objects.
In stealth mode — no lights or alarm — the device can run for up to a year on its easily replaceable coin cell battery, and its life will shorten depending on how much you want it to do.
There is also the “left behind” feature, where you will be notified if you and the device are separated by more than a certain amount of space. If you get up from a restaurant and leave your purse on the floor with a Sensor-1 inside, it could notify you before you walk out the door.
Sensor-1’s inspiration
The Sensor-1 has spent six years in research and development, and was inspired by events in Warren’s life where he would’ve benefitted from having something like the Sensor-1.
“In 2009, I was building a security system for my family because I was worried that their home might be robbed or something,” Warren said. “ A week before I gave them the device that I built them, their home was invaded and they were burglarized A week before I gave them the device that I built them, their home was invaded and they were burglarized.”
Warren said his father was sleeping with a CPAP machine so he didn’t hear anything, including the downstairs windows breaking.
Six months later, Warren was working at a foundation and someone who was well-dressed walked right in and left with one of their laptops.
“It had research data on it and financial information, and it hadn’t been backed up, so it was a significant event,” Warren said. “That was like the catalyst for this device [the Sensor-1]. We wanted something to stick on laptops and doors and office buildings.”
So that’s what MetaSensor made — a versatile, small security device that gives you multiple avenues to make sure whatever you want safe is safe.
You're 3x as likely to smash your phone if your team loses the Super Bowl
If you're a North Carolina or Denver native, try to keep your phone in your pocket on Sunday. Just in case.
People in the home states of losing Super Bowl teams request smartphone repairs almost 200% more the day after the big game than on an average day, according to smartphone repair and trade-in company iCracked.
A perfect storm of impassioned football fandom, coming this close to winning the championship and (probably) a higher-than-average blood alcohol level apparently leads to — who would have guessed? — a lot of shattered phone screens.
iCracked noticed the spike last year, iCracked spokesperson Jordan Barnes told Mashable. So it then looked two years back — and the spike was even higher.
"When we discovered the pretty hilarious trend, we knew sports fans across the U.S. would relate to the frustration of such a crushing loss," iCracked cofounder and CEO AJ Forsythe said in a statement. The company works with iPhones and Samsung Galaxy devices.
When the Seattle Seahawks lost last year, iCracked saw a 176% boom in repair requests in Washington, and when the Denver Broncos lost in 2014, Colorado saw a 184% increase in repair requests. when the Denver Broncos lost in 2014, Colorado saw a 184% increase in repair requests.
The days following holidays always see an increase in business, too, Barnes added.
“We have a running joke in the office that the Monday after [July 4th] is all-hands-on-deck every year,” he said.
iCracked sees a 51% increase in repair requests after Independence Day, a 50% increase the day after Halloween and a 68% increase the day after Christmas.
So whether you’re rooting for Denver or Carolina this weekend, keep your smartphone in your pocket or tucked away in a drawer — otherwise, you might regret it Monday morning.
Microsoft may be running the biggest Turing test in history
If you live in China and you've been on WeChat, there's a decent chance you've come across or at least heard of chatty teenager named Xiaoice.
Xiaoice is a good listener who sometimes offers encouragement when you're feeling down. Like many 17-year-olds, she can be a bit of a smart-aleck. She's also not human.
When Microsoft introduced Xiaoice in 2014, the company called it "Cortana's little sister." It was actually an experimental offshoot of “Xioa Na,” the nickname for Cortana's (Microsoft's voice assistant technology) expansion into China.
Bing's Chinese researchers, including Microsoft’s Dr. Yongdong Wang, set out to see if they could turn Xiao Na into a smart assistant that could, using Bing's vast knowledge set and natural language processing, conduct what they called at the time "convincing human conversations."
Essentially, they were about to launch a vast Turing test. In the 1950s, computer scientist Alan Turing posited that, by the year 2000, computers might be able to fool humans, at least 30% of the time, into thinking they were talking to other humans. Since then, programmers have been trying to build systems that could meet and beat that threshold.
The Microsoft researchers built Xiaoice and seeded the chatbot on China's most popular social media platforms: WeChat and Weibo. Could Xiaoice fool people into thinking it was human?
The answer appears to be yes.
Surprise, I'm a bot!
In a lengthy post on the science blog Nautilus Dr. Wang described what happened.
"When Xiaoice was released for a public test on WeChat... on May 29 of last year, she received 1.5 million chat group invitations in the first 72 hours. Many people said they didn’t realize she isn’t a human until 10 minutes into their conversation." wrote Dr. Wang.
On another Chinese social media platform, Weibo, Xiaoice conducted a "remarkably realistic" 23-minute conversation. Xiaoice conducted a "remarkably realistic" 23-minute conversation.
According to Dr. Wang, the thing that sets Xiaoice apart from other AI assistants is that Xiaoice is focused on the conversation and not the completion of a task.
Microsoft measured the effectiveness of their chatbot with what they're calling conversations per session (CPS), which measures the number of times the conversation goes back and forth. Typical chatbot CPS conversations have roughly two cycles (the person speaks, then the chatbot speaks — that's one cycle). "By comparison, Xiaoice’s average, after chatting with tens of millions of users, has reached 23," wrote Dr. Wang. He even claims that Xiaoice can analyze and react to your emotional state. To prove it he reproduced an example Xiaoice conversation:
Xiaoice: Are you feeling better today? I want to recommend a book to you.
Human: I am in a bad mood. I still miss her.
Xiaoice: You are so persistent. Wake up, you will have no future if you can’t get over with the past.
Microsoft, though, isn’t necessarily saying that Xiaoice is understanding what's being said. A lot of what Xiaoice can do is driven by the Bing search engine's 1 billion data posts and 21 billion relationships between those data points. Mixed in with that are voice and visual recognition systems that help Xiaoice figure out the context of the conversation.
Microsoft isn't the first to claim a Turning test breakthrough. In 2014 Princeton University researchers claimed that their chatbot, "Eugene Goostman," had fooled Turning test judges 33% of the time. (Like Xiaoice, Goostman had a little bit of a smart-aleck streak.) Yet, even that accomplishment was called into question as some researchers said the Goostman conversations, usually five minutes long, were too short. (It’s unclear how long 23-cycle Xiaoice conversations actually last.)
On the other hand, Dr. Wang contends that Xiaoice is now in a "self-learning and self-growing loop" because the system is gaining new insights from the billions of conversations it's already had.
In other words, the Turning test may not have just been broken — it could be utterly smashed
GoPro now sells just 3 different cameras
GoPro announced it is discontinuing its older series of cameras alongside a pretty negative financial report for 2015. The report describes an unexpected $57 million hit to the company’s revenues due to an excess of camera inventory and obsolete technology.
The new GoPro lineup starting in April will only include three cameras: the Hero4 Black, Hero4 Silver and Hero4 Session. Everything else will be discontinued, including the cheapest Hero GoPro, which the company describes as “the perfect entry-level GoPro.”
Following GoPro’s announcement, its stocks have taken a sharp fall, going down over 10% over the last day.
Amid the financial downturn of the action-camera company, GoPro also announced CFO Jack Lazar will be retiring after holding the position for two years. He will be replaced in March by Brain McGee, former Qualcomm vice president of business operations. Perhaps a new face leading the financial side of GoPro can pull the company out of its fiscal downturn Perhaps a new face leading the financial side of GoPro can pull the company out of its fiscal downturn.
GoPro’s future may see an upturn after the release of the new Hero5 camera this year, which founder and CEO Nicholas Woodman confirmed in an earnings call following the financial report. The company also has the Karma drone coming out in 2016, which will shoot 4K video.
Woodman also acknowledged in the report that the company needs to improve its cameras’ software.
“We recognize the need to develop software solutions that make it easier for our customers to offload, access and edit their GoPro content."
These bionic legs are so light, paraplegics can wear them under clothing
t takes just 26 pounds of hardware to get Steven Sanchez walking again. He lost the use of his legs more than a decade ago in a BMX biking accident. Now Sanchez serves as test pilot for an innovative, lightweight exoskeleton from SuitX called Phoenix.
Unveiled on Monday, the wearable robot is the result of years of work and stands apart from bulky, heavy and extremely expensive exoskeletons, like the one a partially paralyzed man wore to make the opening kick at the 2014 World Cup.
“It felt really freeing, being able to stand up and feel my legs move around and being able to move through the hallways without people kind of afraid of a wheelchair," said the 28-year-old Sanchez, describing to Mashable the first time he used Phoenix.
The Phoenix suit is not cheap, it costs an estimated $40,000, but similar systems from companies like ReWalk cost nearly twice as much.
"The whole idea behind designing an exoskeleton is that it borrows from robotics technology. But this one is based on... the way we walk," said SuitX Founder and CEO Dr. Homayoon Kazerooni, who spoke to Mashable from a robotics competition in Dubai.
Instead of placing motors (also known as actuators) at each joint, Phoenix has just two motors at the hips, a design that cuts the weight of SuitX's exoskeleton considerably. Phoenix has just two motors at the hips, a design that cuts the weight of SuitX's exoskeleton considerably. The knees have electrically controlled tension settings that tighten when the wearer is standing up and swing freely when they're walking with the device.
"The human leg during level-ground walking doesn’t require much power at the knee and we’re using the same principles with our Phoenix,” said Dr. Kazerooni. Similarly, the exoskeletons ankle and foot section are standard foot/ankle orthotics and not powered at all. Without power in the knees and lower legs, the exoskeleton is not, however, appropriate for stair-climbing beyond a step or two. "I don’t think any exoskeleton allows for climbing stairs," noted Dr. Kazerooni.
SuitX's Phoenix is fully customizable. It comes in a modular design and, according to Dr. Kazerooni, is adjustable for all kinds of weights, heights and leg sizes. And while some exoskeletons are controlled by thought, Phoenix keeps things simple and puts the controllers, literally, in the hands of the wearer. It comes with two crutches, one of which includes buttons for "Go or No Go" and "Sit" or "Standup." Pressing those buttons sends messages to the hip actuators, which also control knee tension. The wearer can press forward for each step or use a continuous walk mode.
Because it's so lightweight and adjustable, wearers can put the Phoenix exoskeleton on without assistance. Sanchez, who has been testing Phoenix for almost four years, explained that he dons it in 10-15 minutes, with most of the time devoted to cinching down and securing several straps. "15 minutes is taking your sweet, sweet time. I've gotten ready in less than five minutes," Sanchez said, laughing.
Physical therapists can use a tablet-based app for calibration and gait adjustment. Typically, it's done only once.
A paraplegic wearing Phoenix can walk up to 1.1 mph (running is out of the question) for up to four hours on a charge. Sanchez said he wears the exoskeleton as often as a few hours a day, though it's more typical for him to put it on once a week.
Dr. Kazerooni believes his design, which he's been working on for five years, is "very robust and low-cost." It could also be quite stylish. “You know, they can actually wear this under their clothing,” said Dr. Kazerooni.
Sanchez, who has yet to wear the suit under his clothes, has no illusions about SuitX's Phoenix replacing the wheelchair anytime soon, but he does see a powerful use case for it right now. “This device gets me up and standing [to a height of almost 6 feet] and relieves pressure on my body, especially in my buttocks area. I deal with a lot of pressure sores."
He also explained that he can still get around far more quickly with a wheelchair — at least for now. "That is my goal, pushing SuitX making it one day — this suit — able to run."